跳到主要內容

《Soil Security》藉由土壤的關懷,展現臺灣的大學對社會責任之實踐

Soil connectivity makes university social responsibility practice in Taiwan

(藉由土壤的關懷,展現臺灣的大學對社會責任之實踐)

Abstract

This paper describes examples of actions taken for the connectivity between soil and society to inspire soil awareness in Taiwan, particularly by the practices of university social responsibility (USR) including workshops of soil survey education in Taiwan (WOSSET) carried out from 2015 to 2019, the Farmers Academy, soil profiles diagnoses for crop growth, the soil museum, and soil art applications. In the WOSSET, the students learned the skills of soil description, classification and interpretation on the impacts of soil management, suitability classes of crop production and land uses. The students considered the experience from the WOSSET as positive impacts on their professional careers making them “seed-spreaders” for soil connectivity between scientists and the general public by promoting their dedication to future practices of USR. In the program of the Farmers Academy, soil concepts related to soil properties, fertilizer, plant nutrition, compost and soil management have been taught by speakers from university faculties; thus the trained young farmers are able to obtain new knowledge of soil science even through the simple observation of soil profile morphology, which are helpful links among crop root growth, soil management and climate change. Inspired by the visual impact from the visits to soil museum in the university, soil was applied as pigments by artists on artistic practices such as painting and fabric. The actions of soil connectivity enable the general public and students to understand soil functions and soil security as well as construct the knowledge foundation of communication on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

期刊摘錄

Art application based on soil knowledge

Soils are the consequence of the interactions of parent materials, climate, biota, topography, and time. As aforementioned, through soil science courses within universities, workshops of soil survey education and agricultural practices, the connotation of soil science can be passed on within scientific community and society. On the other hand, instead of digging into scientific theories, crafts people and artists emphasize the esthetic properties of soils and visualized pedogenic processes with an intuitive approach, i.e., utilization as artistic media in visual arts (Toland and Wessolek, 2014).

The application of soils as pigments in artworks is one of their most common roles in artistic practices throughout history (van Breemen, 2010). For instance, Austronesian Taiwanese paint “ipanitika” (a traditional wooden fishing vessel) is made with autochthonous red soils of the Orchid Island, an offshore island of Taiwan. In the systematic records of painting materials, there is a specific database The Color of Art Pigment Database which archived the Color index Number of all pigments (Gottsegen, 1993). Soil pigments or earth pigments are classified as nature pigments, which include inorganic mineral/earth pigments made out of minerals or rocks and organic lake soil pigments made out of soils which were dyed by biological effects. Usually, the first code of their color index numbers is N representing the word natural. For instance, the color index number of NBr8 (Van Dyke Brown) is a brown pigment made of peat soils (Myers, 2016). Nevertheless, numerous pigments have been used considerably throughout history which do not use N in their color index numbers. Some examples include: PW19 (Kaolin) is a white pigment made of kaolinite, PG23 (Terre Verte) is a green pigment made out of celadonite and glauconite (both minerals from mica group), PR102 (Terra di Sienna) is a red pigment made out of soils with high iron oxides level and PY43 (Yellow Ochre) is a yellow pigment made out of limonite (Myers, 2016). 

Dr. Hao-Lun Hung, one of authors in this paper, a local artist and experienced art educator, has been inspired by the diverse appearance of soils and created a series of high-chroma soil pigments using soils collected throughout Taiwan (Fig. 5a). For example, he made a brownish pigment out of soils with andic soil properties from Yangmingshan National Park, Taipei, a pale green pigment out of soils with periodic waterlogging from paddy fields in Ilan, a crimson pigment out of soils with high iron oxides content from a lowland montane in Nantou, a black pigment out of Mollisols from Taitung. In addition to his artistic practices, Dr. Hung is also trying to raise awareness about soils among the university students by giving lectures on how to produce soil paints for various purposes (e.g., oil painting, watercolor painting, ink washing painting, Nihonga, pastel painting, and encaustic painting) (Fig. 5b), and by introducing different visual arts and soil paints along with specific painting skills (Fig. 5c). For example, the egg tempera, a painting medium which was prevalent in renaissance period using soils as pigments to provide colors, can be applied to teach the cross-hatching painting skill. Moreover, students supervised by Dr. Hung have developed a series of products using soils as the main ingredient, such as dyes, nail polishes, crayons, and watercolors basing on their sensory comprehension of soil properties. It is worth mentioning that the watercolors product “Knowing Our Land And Its Colors“, which were made out of eight types of soils with different colors collected around Taiwan, has won the recognition from the Red Dot Award 2021.

Yun-Chu Chen, a local fabric-dyeing artist, applies Dr. Hung's the knowledge of soil pigments with resist dyeing techniques such as tie-dye and ikat using rope and/or clips and created a series of earth-tone soil-dyeing fabric. Through workshops and lectures of soil art and artistic commodification, contemporary artists invent innovative approaches to introduce the rich connotation of soil science outside of scientific community and create the opportunities of social engagement in soil science education.


留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

壓克力膠轉印技法

壓克力 ( 丙烯 ) 膠轉印技法 ( Acrylic gel transfer ) 示範 :   這幾年開設了繪畫材料學和複合媒材創作課程, 洪老師多半僅在課堂上示範,學生留下的照片也很少, 自己也忘記拍照,加上最近有幾班學員需要老師示範, 為了示範說明時不用等待漫長的吹乾 ( 有間教室因吹風機還跳電 ) , 所以就有這篇文章,僅供教學時參考。   壓克力膠顏料 ( 就是丙烯顏料 ) , 近年來已經是許多油畫老師用來選擇替代油畫的主流繪畫材料, 其實壓克力顏料和傳統顏料一樣都是「膠」加上「色粉」製成, 所以有了「膠」就可以做很多傳統繪畫媒材可以做的事, 比方說;上膠、自己 DIY 做打底劑 (GESSO) 、自製各種顏色的壓克力顏料 … , 這些有上過洪老師課程的都應該要知道。 複合媒材 (mixed medium) 的運用可追溯到 1910 年代, 歐美藝術家開始將日常生活中的物質如 : 布料、木頭、雜誌、 舊報紙、印刷品、照片……等材料融入藝術品中, 具代表性的藝術家有畢卡索 (Picasso) 直接用現成物貼在畫上, 還有馬諦斯 (Matisse) 用剪紙 ( D é coupage ) 創作一系列平面藝術品, D é coupage(法文音:迭柯八傑) 在台灣被翻譯成蝶谷 巴 特, 這些都是一百年前甚至更早 ( 剪紙據說源自中國東漢以前 ) 就已經是藝術創作的表現技法。 所需材料:壓克力膠 (Acrylic gel) 、影印圖片、打底劑、筆刷、畫刀、美工刀、和紙膠帶、吹風機、基底材 ( 亞麻畫布,本篇示範則用麻布袋 ) 、裝水的筆洗桶。 以下洪老師以「正面取畫」的方式示範壓克力膠轉印技法, 另外有另一種「背面取畫」的方式因為需要影像處理成「鏡射」, 否則印出來的影像會像版畫一樣左右顛倒, 多己經在課堂中有示範故不另再補充。 1.首先是準備壓克力膠和列印圖片,本篇示範用的列印圖片是洪老師2013年用QR-CODE設計的創作品之一。 2.用畫刀塗上壓克力膠。 3.翻到背面用紙膠帶固定住四個角落。 4.用筆刷刷上水分並開始用手搓掉紙張纖維。   5.除去所有纖維後吹...

傳統西洋架上繪畫的打底

傳統西洋架上繪畫(蛋彩畫、油畫)的打底 -- 水性底打底( Gesso) 學生最常提問: 為什麼畫油畫前要先打底?打底前為何要先上膠?為什麼要打底?為什麼要上凡尼斯?保護劑是什麼? 所以建議要先具備以下概念、觀念。 架上繪畫的材料層架構: 「 (最上層) 保護層(凡尼斯Vanish、固定噴膠...) ↑↑↑↑↑ 繪畫層(油彩、蛋彩、膠彩...) ↑↑↑↑↑ 打底層(Gesso) ↑↑↑↑↑ 上膠層(膠、礬...) ↑↑↑↑↑ 基底材層(木板、畫布、紙)                               (最底層) 」 一 、上膠 傳統的打底需要先上膠,上膠用的材料: 免皮膠、純水、大排筆刷 、隔水加熱用鍋具、卡式瓦斯爐或電磁爐。 基本上需要將木板或亞麻畫布的正面全部都塗上一層以上的兔皮膠。 1.煮膠(將1:10的兔皮膠與純水隔水加熱至溶解) 2.整平畫板(以800號水砂紙研磨畫板) 3.塗膠(以排刷按照一定方向塗刷兔皮膠) 4.晾乾(均勻塗抹兔皮膠後充分乾燥晾乾) 二、打底 傳統水性打底Gesso用的材料: 免皮膠、純水、碳酸鈣粉、白色色粉(鈦白/鋅白)、大排筆刷 、隔水加熱用鍋具、 卡式瓦斯爐或電磁爐。 傳統兔皮膠打底劑Gesso製作與施作如下 : 1. 將煮好的兔皮膠水加入碳酸鈣 打底劑的兔皮膠液體與碳酸鈣約1:1,可以加入不定比例的白色色粉(鈦白或鋅白),不加白色色粉亦可。 2.水性打底第一層 可適當的永筆刷沾水去調打底劑,重點是讓排筆拖的動,先打一層左右方向的(← →)後待乾 。 3.水性打底第二層 等第一層完全乾燥後,始可打第二層,這一層筆刷改用上下方向的(↑↓)筆觸的。 4.水性打底第三~七層 確認第二層打底乾燥後,再刷一層左右方向的(← →)打底劑 。 這一種西洋繪畫的打底至少要3層以上,確認皆乾燥後,可以用800號的水砂紙旋轉畫板表面輕輕研磨。 接著繼續打第4~7層打底劑,在第5層時可以用1200號的水砂紙旋轉畫...

燒製藝用柳條炭筆,兼談柳樹在台灣的被污名化

從文藝復興以降,炭筆素描是西方繪畫的最主要基本功,當代各國的美術學院、設計學院都仍保留炭筆素描的訓練基礎課程。 圖說:燒製炭筆的過程,順道烤棉花糖、烤肉 炭筆的燒製主要材料為葡萄藤與柳樹,葡萄藤彎曲折多,燒製需要各種工法才能去掉硬皮,處理不易;柳樹則多半只要趁新鮮,就能輕鬆剝去外皮,燒製前的作業相對容易。 我在大學藝術系裡,帶領學生燒製柳條炭筆畫素描、製作做碳黑色油畫顏料有十幾年的經驗,但我發現在台灣要找的柳樹已漸漸不易。可能這學期還看得到可以採集的地點,下學期學生就說樹不見了,主要是被台灣民間的錯誤風俗流傳而砍掉了。 圖說 炭筆燒製的半成品、成品與炭筆素描作品 柳樹在台灣的形象被污名化 柳樹的形象在台灣的漢族移民大致經歷了三個階段的轉變: 1、​古代中國(正向陽樹): 台灣早期移民仍維持柳樹是神聖、驅邪、送別、生命力的象徵。 2、​台灣初期移民漢人農耕社會(中性實用): 主要作為鞏固田埂、護堤的經濟作物,實用價值高於象徵意義。 3、​近代台灣民間(負向陰樹): 逐漸與陰暗、鬼魂、喪事產生連結,被污名化。 但,在台灣的​道教儀式中,柳樹始終保有其驅邪、溝通神鬼的法力(法器),未受台灣廣泛民間污名化影響。 那若回頭看中國大陸目前柳樹陰陽形象情況呢? 首先,「清明插柳」的習俗仍在中國傳承延續,這是柳樹作為「陽樹」最有力的現代證據。在中國北方的許多地區(如山東、山西、河南、河北等地),清明節家家戶戶會在門上插柳、戴柳驅邪的習俗至今依然存在。 延續中國古代的風俗仍相信柳枝有驅邪、辟鬼的功能,能保護家人不受邪氣侵擾。清明插柳這個習俗的傳承,讓柳樹的正面形象在特定節日和地區仍得保留。 但因為「現代」風水與台灣網路次文化的渲染影響,於近現代台灣民間所發展出來的柳樹屬於陰樹的說法,隨著網際網路已隨著網路回傳到中國大陸,如果以中文字搜尋「柳樹、風水」關鍵字,台灣民間柳樹的陰樹形象,已在中國年輕世代形成招惹陰邪的「陰樹」標籤。 可以說,中國古代古典正面的柳樹形象,正在和台灣現代發展出來的負面的柳樹形象,於中國形成共存與拉扯中。 文獻探討,柳樹在古代中國風俗屬於楊樹的各種例證: 1、北魏 《齊民要術》正月「削柳為人」以辟不祥。 ​「正月旦,取柳枝著戶上,百鬼不入家。正月旦,削柳為人,帶之,百鬼莫入。」 2、南朝《荊楚歲時記》寒食節插柳以禦鬼...